Shame on you Facebook: Privacy Settings and Community Pages
I’ve been quite willing to share a lot of my personal information online. For the most part, I’m an “open book”.
Now I have 3 words for Facebook: “Shame on you”.
Years ago, some people warned me about Facebook’s Privacy Policy and its disclaimer that any content I share on Facebook (including pictures) becomes the property of Facebook. I thought they were over-reacting.
Until now.
Recently, there has been a lot of coverage about the new changes to Facebook, including the Instant Personalization program (We posted a blog on how opt-out – but perhaps it’s all a moot point?).
As a marketer, I’ve been curious to see what would happen. Would brands gain more insights into their fans/likers? Would Facebook become an omnipresent entity across the web? This content could be exceptionally valuable.
Yet, on a personal level, this “Open Graph” program makes me VERY nervous. I wonder if Facebook could become the REAL beginning of 1984’s “Big Brother”?
With almost 500 million users, I’m sure Facebook is smug enough to think they can take over the web.
This afternoon, a Social Media marketing mentor (and friend), Anita Windisman went to a concert by popular ’80s band, “The Spoons”. After uploading her pictures and making comments to her own personal Facebook page, suddenly her image and comments appeared on “The Spoons” Community Page .
(I can confidently say that both Anita and I know our way around Facebook well enough that our Privacy Settings have been optimized to only share information with “Friends”.)
As you can see below, our comments are being shared as if we hadn’t set our Privacy Settings at all.
(Note: After logging in from another account, I could no longer see this shared content. But suffice it to say, without clear delineation of what is clearly being shared just to friends versus what is going out publicly, I’m going to be even more careful about the content I share.)
Some key insights from Anita:
- When you join a “Community Page” be aware that key words from your status updates and photo uploads will be analyzed and then posted to that Community Page.
- Words or key phrases that you may not even think are relevant are used. So in the case of “The Spoons”….if you have a status update that states “I ate my spaghetti with a spoon” or that “Ivanka Trump was born with a silver spoon” in her mouth – then THOSE posts would make it to “The Spoons” community page.
- There is NO screening for RELEVANCE!
- And there is no way to “flag” irrelevant posts on the community pages.
When “Community Pages” were launched, it was done quietly. There were no big announcements. Facebook didn’t really explain what they were and how they would be used. So we’ve had to figure it out on our own.
From a marketing perspective, Jeremiah Owyang outlines “Community Pages”, why Facebook is making these changes and what he suggest brands should do.
But from a personal standpoint, it’s not surprising that tech gurus, such as Leo Laporte have deleted their account.
In “15 Reasons to Ditch Facebook” (via Anita Windisman) Yoav Givati includes reasons such as the constantly changing terms, confusing and irrelevant privacy settings and that Facebook Applications can see all your personal information (you hear this Farmville people?).
If people well-versed in Facebook and other social media sites are concerned about where Facebook is going, then it’s highly probably we’ll see a mass exodus once “anti-Facebook” sites (such as the much anticipated Diaspora) come along.
But Mr. Zuckerberg, in case you forgot, the new way of marketing is all about TRUST, RELATIONSHIPS and TRANSPARENCY. The power is in the hands of the PEOPLE, remember?
Yes, we know “what goes on the Internet, stays on the Internet”, but when when you violate our trust, mislead us and don’t act ethically, we will move on to the next big thing. (Am I right, MySpace?)
(In the meantime, dear friends, I’m curious to know if anyone has used the free tool available from ReclaimPrivacy.org. Please let us know if you have used it and what you think.)


Nicely said Leslie! The Community Pages privacy violation caught us BOTH by surprise today. Glad we learned from this experience sooner, rather than later.
Great post. Speaking of MySpace I read today that they’re making their privacy settings simpler and more effective. Originally people migrated from MySpace to Facebook for the privacy, now it looks like the opposite will be true. At the very least it’ll be interesting to watch how MySpace takes advantage of Facebook’s immaturity, and if they can reign in some of what were originally their members.
Thanks for YOUR original post Yoav! Your insights provide great clarity to what is currently quite confusing.
I just received a notice today that Facebook’s Public Policy Director, Tim Sparapani recently stated the company will also be releasing simple privacy settings in the next few weeks.
I think it’s possible Facebook can salvage themselves but only to those who are too lazy, or too uneducated to migrate to another site.
It’s really too bad. I was a raving fan of Facebook before they violated my trust.
Great article. If Facebook thinks that automatically posting links to community pages is a great selling feature, they are wrong. If I was an advertiser, I wouldn’t want 100 happy visitors out of 100,000 because I am more likely to get 99,900 unhappy ones. Better privacy settings are the way to go. You cannot force people to do or buy something they not interested in.
Quality of leads is far better than quantity, you’re right Michael. A whole lot of nonsense doesn’t benefit anyone. Particularly advertisers.
Enough complaining and ranting already and let the people decide what they want to do. State your opinion and back it up with facts. Labeling users “lazy” and “uneducated” isn’t going to win you any fans by the way. I’ve just about had it with these Facebook “protesters.” Facebook didn’t force people to join their site so if they don’t like it they are free to close their account.
I agree with you, BTorres, that the people SHOULD decide. They should be able to decide what they want to share and with whom.
I’m unclear to the facts you are looking for. This rant I have published was based on a personal experience. These are my personal facts.
If there were no privacy settings to opt in to, then I wouldn’t have expectations that, perhaps, my content WOULD be kept private. You’re right, Facebook didn’t force me to join their site and I can close it (but I cannot necessarily delete – because Facebook has the right to the content of my account).
I think what is unfortunate is that most people don’t know how to access their privacy settings and Facebook is taking advantage and monetizing their vulnerabilities.
[…] I disagree with Mark Zuckerberg from Facebook who states that privacy is no longer a ‘social […]
[…] impressions made affordable. August 16, 2010 tags: Facebook ads by punchmedia Despite my Facebook rant, I’m still an avid user of this platform. In addition to personal connections, I also […]